Inclusive Feminism Must Include Trans Voices

Dear Editor,

As the world observes International Women’s Day and reflects throughout International Women’s Month, we are reminded that the struggle for gender equality has always been about expanding the boundaries of justice and dignity. Feminist movements have historically challenged discrimination, violence, and systemic barriers faced by women and girls. Yet, as global conversations on equality evolve, it is important that feminism remains inclusive and responsive to the realities of all women, including transgender and gender non-conforming people whose voices have often been marginalized within broader gender justice movements.

The urgency of this conversation is underscored by sobering global data. According to the World Health Organization and UN Women, nearly one in three women worldwide, approximately 840 million women, have experienced physical or sexual violence in their lifetime. In the past year alone, an estimated 316 million women, or about 11 percent of women aged 15 and older, experienced physical or sexual violence by an intimate partner. Women who experience violence are also more likely to face serious health consequences including depression, sexually transmitted infections, and unintended pregnancies.

These statistics also reveal deeper structural inequalities. Global research shows that women living in climate vulnerable and low income contexts, including Small Island Developing States, often face higher levels of intimate partner violence than the global average. Climate related disasters, displacement, and economic instability can increase stress within households, disrupt access to health and protection services, and heighten risks of gender based violence.

Yet within these already troubling realities, some women remain largely invisible in public policy and advocacy discussions. Transgender and gender non-conforming women frequently experience heightened stigma, barriers to healthcare, discrimination in employment, and violence in both public and private spaces. Their experiences rarely appear in official data, meaning the scale of the problem is often underestimated. The absence of inclusive data, policies, and services perpetuates cycles of vulnerability that undermine broader efforts toward gender equality.

In Jamaica and across the Caribbean, organizations such as TransWave Jamaica have been working to change this reality. Through community empowerment, research, policy advocacy, and partnerships with health providers, civil society, and international agencies, the organization has helped bring attention to the intersection of gender justice, health access, climate vulnerability, and human rights for transgender and gender non-conforming people. This work recognizes that inclusive feminism must address not only gender based violence but also structural barriers that prevent marginalized communities from accessing healthcare, safe housing, employment, and disaster response systems.

Importantly, the struggle for inclusive gender equality is not about competing rights but about expanding them. Feminism at its core seeks to dismantle systems that harm people because of gender. When transgender women and gender non-conforming communities are included in these conversations, the global movement for justice becomes stronger. A feminism that recognizes intersectionality acknowledges that discrimination is shaped by overlapping identities such as gender, race, sexuality, class, and geography.

As we reflect during International Women’s Month, there is an opportunity for policymakers, advocates, and the public to recommit to a vision of feminism that is inclusive, intersectional, and grounded in human rights. The fight against gender based violence, health inequities, and climate injustice cannot succeed if the most marginalized voices remain unheard. True progress requires listening to and uplifting those voices, particularly trans women who have long been excluded from spaces that claim to champion equality.

If gender justice is to mean anything in the twenty first century, it must include everyone whose lives are shaped by gender discrimination. Inclusive feminism is not simply an ideal, it is a necessity for building a more just, equitable, and compassionate society.

Lamar Grant

Interim Executive Director

TransWave Jamaica

Fairness or Fear: The Hidden Agenda Behind Sport’s New Exclusions

Fairness has been used to justify the International Olympic Committee’s decision to prohibit transgender athletes from participating in women’s Olympic competitions. Evidence, however, indicates that this policy is more about regulating identity, who is allowed to engage in public life without scrutiny, more than it is about safeguarding competition in the sport. The decision’s scope and consequences expose a larger pattern of exclusion ingrained in elite sport, despite the rhetoric’s emphasis on equity.

The data at hand reveals a glaring disparity between the group targeted by the strategy and its harshness. Although transgender people make about 1% to 2% of the world’s population (Flores et al., 2016), they are remarkably under-represented in professional sports. Less than 0.002% of NCAA athletes in the US are transgender, and even fewer go on to compete internationally (SF Department of Public Health, 2022). Openly transgender athletes’ participation in the Olympics has been statistically insignificant.

Studies show that transgender involvement in sports is characterised by exclusion rather than gain. According to research that was published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, the main causes of transgender people avoiding or leaving sports settings are prejudice and a lack of welcoming conditions (Jones, 2017). Results from Stonewall, which show that around 25% of trans people have encountered prejudice in sporting environments, support this (Stonewall, 2020). According to a Swansea University research from 2024, 81% of female athletes think that sports organisations ought to embrace transgender inclusion more . These results imply that the story of protection is not shared by all members of the athletic community.

The IOC’s decision has ramifications that go beyond the Olympic Games. Legislative trends and larger societal values are frequently shaped by policies implemented at the highest levels of sport. The Human Rights Campaign claims that more than 500 anti-LGBTQ+ measures were submitted in the US in 2023, many of which targeted transgender involvement in public life and education (HRC, 2023).

The management of transgender athletes is not new; it is part of a broader tradition of managing bodies that defy social standards. When their bodies did not fit Western ideals of femininity, female athletes, especially those from the Global South were subjected to decades of intrusive testing and rejection. Black and brown women have been disproportionately impacted by laws pertaining to sex verification and testosterone levels, which have reinforced racialized and gendered inequalities in sports. A blanket ban is a categorical exclusion rather than a neutral regulatory mechanism. It conveys that identity-based disqualification cannot be overcome by whatever degree of success, training, or compliance. This strategy runs the danger of compromising sport’s core values, which include fair opportunity, hard work, and merit.

The conflict between inclusion and control is reflected in the IOC’s policy. Despite being presented as a defence of fairness, the information that is now available indicates that it unfairly singles out a marginalised group without a convincing rationale based on competition facts. Transgender athletes are pushing sport to address its own exclusions rather than changing it via domination. The question is whether sport can claim fairness at all while routinely rejecting individuals who want to join, not whether it can stay fair while growing more inclusive. Policies like this will continue to perpetuate the exact injustices they purport to address unless governing entities are prepared to confront this paradox.